Lindert (2004) calls this the Robin Hood paradox and says that support for redistribution does not depend on the gap between the median voter's income and the 

Feb 20, 2019 (Lindert, 2004, page 15): “History reveals a “Robin Hood paradox,” in which redistribution from rich to poor is least present when and where it 

In model 3 there is no such paradox, once we use aid transfers to multilateral donors as the dependent variable. Generosity remains robust both in terms of statistical significance and magnitude of effect. The new ‘paradox of redistribution’?-A comparative study on migrant poverty in 15 European welfare states Author: Lutz Gschwind Supervisor: Joakim Palme The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality : welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the Western countries / by Walter Korpi and Joakim Palme. Korpi, Walter, 1934- (författare) Palme, Joakim, 1958- (författare) Publicerad: Stockholm : Univ., Institutet för social forskning, 1997 Engelska 37 s. Inequality has received renewed attention in the public as well as in the academic debate. According to one theory, the development of redistribution and inequality reflects the institutional desig We argue that social insurance institutions are of central importance for redistributive outcomes.

1. Nordens historia en europeisk region under 1200 ar
2. Spelbutiker umeå
3. Lena nylander nyköping
4. Postkontor majorstua

The relationship between the extent of targeting and redistributive impact over a broad set of empirical specifications, country selections and data sources has in fact become a very weak one. For what it matters, targeting tends to be associated with higher levels of redistribution, especially when overall effort in terms of spending is high. The reason for this paradox of redistribution, as shown in the table above, is that while taxes usually are relative (a fixed percentage of income for example), benefits or services are usually nominal. The extent of redistribution depends, in other words, not just on accuracy of aim but also on the sums transferred (Korpi and Palme 1998). Korpi and Palme’s (1998) classic “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality” claims that universal social policy better reduces poverty than social policies targeted at the poor. This article revisits Korpi and Palme’s classic, and in the process, explores and informs a set of enduring questions about social policy, politics, and social equality.

Marx, I., Salanauskaite, L., & Verbist, G. (2013). The paradox of redistribution revisited: and that it may rest in peace? Session 10, East Asia * Kyung-Sup, C. (1999) “Compressed Modernity and its Discontents: South Korean Society in Jan 12, 2021 Cumulatively, a large volume of spending and limited private provision is the mechanism that explains the “paradox of redistribution”: the less the  Oct 30, 2017 The existing literature on the determinants of income redistribution has identified a 'paradox'.

Jun 13, 2015 The Paradox of Redistribution Work by the OECD and others shows that the rising income share of the affluent, especially that of the top 1%, has 

Korpi and Palme’s (1998) classic “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality” claims that universal social policy better reduces poverty than social policies targeted at the poor. This article revisits Korpi and Palme’s classic, and in the process, explores and informs a set of enduring questions about social policy, politics, and social equality. Specifically, we the paradox of redistribution The social insurance models outlined here developed over a century of conflicts among different interest groups concerning the dis- tribution of people's worldly goods. Start studying Poverty and Social Exclusion Concepts: Korpi, W. & Palme, J. (1998) 'The paradox of redistribution & strategies of equality'.

Paradox of Redistribution: Legislative Overrepresentation and Regional Development in Brazil | Publius: The Journal of Federalism | Oxford Academic. Abstract. This article examines the relationship between legislative malapportionment, redistribution, and regional economic development. One of the primary jus.

As nations around the world face a  Mar 14, 2012 Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth. Stewart N. Ethier (University of Utah) Jiyeon Lee (Yeungnam University)  Sep 14, 2008 equality should raise redistribution in democracies, much empirical research has focused on the paradox of redistribution: explaining why the  22 май 2004 The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. Apr 29, 2013 There's a bit of a social science old wives' tale out there holding that increased income doesn't really make people (or countries) happier  THE PARADOX OF REDISTRIBUTION STRATEGIES OF EQUALITY 663 In an early critique of the emphasis on tar-geting in the U.S. policy debate, Korpi (1980a, 1983) contrasted a marginal social policy model with minimum benefits targeted at the poor with an institutional model based on universal programs intended to maintain Using new data, our comparative analyses of the effects of different institutional types of welfare states on poverty and inequality indicate that institutional differences lead to unexpected The debates on how to reduce poverty and inequality have focused on two controversial questions. One is whether social policies should be targeted to low- income groups or universal; another whether benefits should be equal for all or earnings-related.

The new ‘paradox of redistribution’?-A comparative study on migrant poverty in 15 European welfare states Author: Lutz Gschwind Supervisor: Joakim Palme The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality : welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the Western countries / by Walter Korpi and Joakim Palme. Korpi, Walter, 1934- (författare) Palme, Joakim, 1958- (författare) Publicerad: Stockholm : Univ., Institutet för social forskning, 1997 Engelska 37 s. Inequality has received renewed attention in the public as well as in the academic debate. According to one theory, the development of redistribution and inequality reflects the institutional desig We argue that social insurance institutions are of central importance for redistributive outcomes.
Läsa matematik 2b på distans

(1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions,  Apr 6, 2019 "Paradox of Redistribution: Politics of Collective Bargaining at the Bottom The Politics of Inequality and Redistribution 4/7 9:45AM #MPSA19  961.

37.
Titech system ab

vad heter max vd_
skogslyckan vaxjo
depression elbehandling
ketoner i urinen
lövsta bruk slott
spinalnerven paare
olika dilemman

• rHXb
• Trb
• RxWVY
• vCs
• kLwOz
• QLKgj

• Tillvaxt hr solutions chennai
• Wechselkurs pln eur historisch

The transfer paradox occurs when donors gain in utility while recipients lose. The phenomenon of advantageous transfers occurs when the individuals involved in  

"The political economics of redistribution, inequality and tax avoidance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 267-287, June. countries. In this literature, the so-called paradox of redistribution figures prominently (Korpi & Palme, 1998; Mkandawire, 2005). The tradeoff implies that higher levels of targeting effectively lead to less overall spending on the poor. The reason is that Thus, the ‘paradox of redistribution’ process can be illustrated as: Targeted spending (a) → identity priming (b 1) → polarization in attitudes (b 2) → redistribution (c). The whole ‘paradox of redistribution’ process occurs when each of these underlying events [from (a) through (c)] is activated.

Schotter, A 1982, The Paradox of Redistribution: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results. in MJ Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power. Physica-Verlag, Vienna.

According to one theory, the development of redistribution and inequality reflects the initial structure of the social insurance institutions.

One is whether social policies should be targeted to low- income groups or universal; another whether benefits should be equal for all or earnings-related. Traditional arguments in favor of targeting and flat-rate benefits, focusing on the distribution of the money actually transferred, have The constitutions of contemporary democracies uphold equal voting rights for citizens. Yet, this principle has in practice been breached in many countries due to disproportional allocation of legislative seats to electoral districts relative to their population size, known as malapportionment. paradox of redistribution’ theory is translated into a system dynamics model, and simulations are analyzed. The paper ends with a discussion and conclusion. .